Legal Opinion

Pryor Mountain Oil & Gas Co. v. Cross

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1924No. 1062PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blume, Justice., A. B. Cross, defendant in error here, brought this action as plaintiff, against The Pryor Mountain Oil & Gas Company,- a corporation, hereinafter referred to as the corporation or the lessor, and Ellen J. Sessions, B. A. Sessions and E. D. Sessions, plaintiffs in error here, to recover the possession of the SW1^ of the NW% of the NW% of Section 34, T 56 N. R. 97, for the purpose of producing and marketing gas therefrom; alleging tha^ plaintiff was entitled to such possession by virtue of the lease hereinafter mentioned. Defendants answered, setting out said lease and alleging…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Grubb v. McAfeeTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Decker v. KirlicksTexas Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Strange v. HicksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Howerton v. Kansas Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  5. Indiana Oil, Gas & Development Co. v. McCrorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  2. Severson v. BarstowMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Pegg v. OlsonWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Davis v. CramerColorado Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Pure Oil Co. v. SturmOhio Court of Appeals · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API