Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Heller v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 18, 1992No. Claim No. 81735Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Mahoney, J. (concurring in part and dissenting in part).

We cannot agree with the majority that its restriction of the term "transfer taxes” basically to the traditional Tax Law article 31 real property transfer tax (i.e., stamp tax) and the local documentary transfer taxes imposed under Tax Law article 29 is plainly obvious from a reading of EDPL 702 (A). Not only does this restrictive interpretation run contrary to the appar*303ent policy concerns underlying the statute, but inasmuch as the Legislature has specifically provided that the taxes to which the majority apparently limits the scope of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Morton Buildings, Inc. v. ChuAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. MATTER OF MORTON BLDGS., INC. v. ChuNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. National Railroad Passenger v. 10,178 Square Feet of Land More or LessDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API