Legal Opinion
Israel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided August 26, 2003No. 3:98CV302 (JBA)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Ruling on Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #82]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
After he was injured and his wife was killed in an automobile accident, David Israel commenced this action against State Farm, 1 which had issued a personal umbrella policy to his parents, Lenore and William Gunther. Following remand from the Second Circuit, 2 State Farm moved for summary judgment on the narrow issue of the maximum possible damages available to plaintiff under the policy. State Farm asserts that a proper construction of the policy terms at issue results in a maximum possible recovery of $400,000, while…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Israel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Insurance Company v. Kelly J. Sayles, Administratrix of the Estate of Bonnie E. Sayles and Andrew SmithCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
- David Israel v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Vargas v. Fuller Brush Co. of Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2004