Legal Opinion

Lorenz v. Lorenz

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1879PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam :

Appellant filed her bill against appellee, in the court below, praying for a divorce on the ground of appellee’s impotency. No appearance was entered by appellee, and the cause was submitted' to the chancellor upon oral proofs, who, after hearing the same, decreed that the bill be dismissed.

The burden of proof was on appellant to establish not only that appellee was impotent, as charged, but also that such impotency is incurable. § 332, Bishop on Marriage and Divorce, vol. 1, (5th ed.); Devenbagh v. Devenbagh, 5 Paige, 557.

The only evidence here of appellee’s impotency is his…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Devanbagh v. DevanbaghNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
  2. Peipho v. PeiphoIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Griffeth v. GriffethIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Rickards v. RickardsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1960
  3. Jorden v. JordenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  4. Kinkaid v. KinkaidIllinois Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API