Monahan v. Matthews
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On ceriimari.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Kalisch, J.
The prosecutor, by this proceeding, attacks the legal propriety of the action of a justice of the Supreme *124Court in granting a recount, by virtue of the'provisions of section 159 of the Election laws, to the defendant, who was a candidate for election under the act, known as the “Walsh act.”
•The contention of the prosecutor is that the aforementioned section is not applicable to a candidate for election under the Walsh act, and that, therefore, the order for a recount should be set aside.
In 1917, the city of Newark adopted a commission form…
2Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Contest of the Alleged Election of HuntCape May County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Stone v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
- Shepherd v. BrumbackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Borger v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935