Legal Opinion

Monahan v. Matthews

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 15, 1918PublishedCited by 4 opinions

On ceriimari.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kalisch, J.

The prosecutor, by this proceeding, attacks the legal propriety of the action of a justice of the Supreme *124Court in granting a recount, by virtue of the'provisions of section 159 of the Election laws, to the defendant, who was a candidate for election under the act, known as the “Walsh act.”

•The contention of the prosecutor is that the aforementioned section is not applicable to a candidate for election under the Walsh act, and that, therefore, the order for a recount should be set aside.

In 1917, the city of Newark adopted a commission form…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re the Contest of the Alleged Election of HuntCape May County Circuit Court, N.J. · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Stone v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Shepherd v. BrumbackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  4. Borger v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API