Legal Opinion

I & M RAIL LINK v. Northstar Navigation

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 21, 1998No. 97 C 8821PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION and ORDER

NORGLE, District Judge.

Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for improper venue and, in the alternative, for lack of personal jurisdiction. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(3), 12(b)(2). For the following reasons, Defendant’s motion is denied. The court, however, transfers this case to the Western Division of the Northern District of Illinois.

I. BACKGROUND

This is a maritime case about a bridge-barge collision on the “Mighty Mississippi.” See generally Mark Twain, Life on the Mississippi (Harper & Row Ed.1965).

Plaintiff I & M Rail Link (“I & M”) owns a railroad bridge that…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Rar, Incorporated, an Illinois Corporation v. Turner Diesel, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zeus Projects Ltd. v. Perez Y Cia. De Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1999
  2. Crumrine v. NEG MICON USA, INC.District Court, N.D. Iowa · 2000
  3. Harrington v. WilberDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
  4. Borghi v. Purple Group, Inc.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API