Legal Opinion
Haden v. Henderson
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided February 27, 1987No. 85-101PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FERREN, Associate Judge:
Appellant, an attorney, challenges an order of the Probate Division of Superior Court awarding her $900 plus $7 in costs as compensation for her services as a guardian ad litem. D.C.Code § 21-1502 (b) (1981); Super.Ct.Civ.R. 304 (b); Super.Ct. Prob.R. 122 (a). The trial court had appointed appellant to represent the interests of Paris Henderson in responding to a complaint filed by his estranged wife, who sought removal of the co-conservators, support from the ward’s estate, and other relief. After dismissal of the wife’s complaint, appellant, with the co-conservators’…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Johnson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cobb v. Standard Drug Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Darling v. DarlingDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1982
- Tauber v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1986
- Rosendorf v. ToomeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams Ex Rel. Williams v. Vel Rey Properties, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Fields v. TillersonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999