Legal Opinion

Wentworth v. Bell

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 21, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.

The decision of this case calls for an interpretation of a part of clause “ 6th ” of the will of Luther V. Bell, who died in 1862. He left four children, two sons and two daughters. One daughter died a minor, unmarried, without issue, in 1868. One son died on April 3, 1917, leaving as his only heirs two sons. Another son died in 1903, leaving no issue, but a widow to whom by will he gave all his property. The last surviving daughter died on April 14, 1917, in Germany, a widow without issue, testate, but her will has not been probated here. She-was the last survivor of the children and the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanger v. BourkeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
  2. Polsey v. NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  3. Jones v. GaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  4. Lawrence v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  5. Shea v. MaitlandMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Daley v. DaleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
  2. Knowlton v. ForbushMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1948
  3. Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. WilburMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  4. Old Colony Trust Co. v. MollesonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  5. Alfau v. MillerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API