Legal Opinion

Cornell Smith Jr v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 19, 2013No. 01-11-00898-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TERRY JENNINGS, Justice.

A jury found appellant, Cornell Smith, Jr., guilty of the offense of murder, 1 and the trial court assessed his punishment at confinement for forty years. In his first of six issues, appellant contends that trial court erred in allowing the State to seek an illegal sentence and mislead the jury panel during voir dire. In his remaining issues, he contends that the trial court erred in admitting evidence of a previously-recorded interview of a witness, irrelevant and prejudicial evidence, evidence of an extraneous offence, and hearsay evidence.

We affirm…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2000
  4. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  5. Santellan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Damian Lamon Murkledove v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  2. Priester v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2015
  3. Carlton Priester v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
  4. Damian Lamon Murkledove v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2014
  5. Ilse A. Bernal v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API