Dimry v. Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHARLES DIMRY, Case No. 19-cv-05360-JSC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER RE: CONFLICT DISCOVERY 9 v. DISPUTE 10 BERT BELL/PETE ROZELLE NFL Re: Dkt. No. 31 PLAYER RETIREMENT PLAN, et al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Plaintiff is a former player in the National Football League. He challenges the decision of 14 the Retirement Board of the Bert Bell/Pete Rozelle NFL Player Retirement Plan (the “Plan”) to 15 deny him total and permanent disability benefits under the Plan and the Employee Retirement 16 Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). Now…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Montour v. Hartford Life & Accident InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Jenkins v. Price Waterhouse Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Daniel Demer v. IBM Corp Ltd PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Anderson v. Suburban Teamsters of Northern Illinois Pension Fund Board of TrusteesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.