Legal Opinion

Matter of Haskell v. Voorhis

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 26, 1927PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

We hold in the circumstances of this case that there was no unjust discrimination to the prejudice of the petitioner.

The Anti-Dry League nominated a single candidate for a single office. A member of that league would have no difficulty in finding the name of that candidate upon the machine, and would not be diverted by the form of the machine into a belief that the name of such candidate was to be looked for elsewhere.

The question is not here whether unfairness or prejudice would result if the League had nominated other candidates whose names were placed upon a separate horizontal column to-…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Matter of Callaghan v. VoorhisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
  2. Robinson v. BrockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. In re ShaefferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  4. Brennan v. ThorpAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
  5. Ferran v. MonahanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API