Green v. Atlanta & C. A. L. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Dissent
The plaintiff, a yard conductor, was shot by one of a gang of car robbers who were surprised by him in their enterprise. The question to be decided upon this appeal is whether or not, under the circumstancesproved, not simply alleged, the employer of the plaintiff is responsible to him in damages for the injury thus sustained.
I emphasize the necessity of proof rather than allegation, for the reason that the decision of this Court upon a former appeal (131 S.C. 124, 126 S.E., 441, 38 A.L.R., 1448) was rendered upon the review of an order of the Circuit Court overruling a demurrer to the…
2Cases cited77 opinions
- Milwaukee & Saint Paul Railway Co. v. KelloggSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Travellers' Insurance v. McConkeySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. CooganSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Insurance Co. v. TweedSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.