Schultz v. Ford Motor Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KIRSCH, Chief Judge.
Richard and Gail Schultz appeal the jury verdict in favor of Ford Motor Company ("Ford") on their product liability and negligence claims, contending that the trial court erred by using Final Instruction No. 23 ("Instruction 28"), which informed the jury that there was a rebuttable presumption that Ford was not negligent in its design of the Ford Explorer if it complied with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard ("FMVSS") 216, concerning roof crush resistance. On appeal, the Schultzes raise the following consolidated and restated issue: whether the trial court erred…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Geier v. American Honda Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ayr-Way Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood Ex Rel. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Collins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1987
- Brown v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Reed v. Central Soya Co., Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schultz v. Ford Motor Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Greenville v. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
- Kelley v. TanoosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- JUDAY v. SADAKADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2023
- Kelley v. TanoosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.