Legal Opinion

Scrivener v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1902No. 2537PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged with violating the disorderly house statute, in that he was then and there the owner, lessee and tenant of a house, and did unlawfully keep, and was concerned in keeping, and did then and there unlawfully and knowingly permit to be kept, said house for the purpose of prostitution, and where prostitutes were permitted to resort and reside for the purpose of plying their vocation. He was convicted and fined $200.

The first bill of exceptions was reserved to the action of the court refusing to permit one of appellant’s attorneys, Hale, to testify…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bonner v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. Terrell v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
  2. Lenzen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Ruben Rodriguez Montano v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API