Legal Opinion

ROYAL OAK SCH. DIST. v. State Tenure Comm.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1962No. Docket 32, Calendar 49,471PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

Esther Palmer, not a party to this suit, was employed by plaintiff school board as a teacher for the school years 1950-1951 through 1958-1959, the last 2 years (since Mrs. Palmer reached age 60) being on an annual contract basis. Plaintiff board did not renew her contract for the ensuing year, and instead sent her a letter stating that her contract would not be renewed. Mrs. Palmer retained counsel and demanded a hearing under the teachers’ tenure act (CL 1948, § 38.71 et seq. [Stat Ann 1959 Rev § 15.1971 et seq.]). Plaintiff board advised her counsel that Mrs. Palmer was not being…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Prawdzik v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Michigan Salt Works v. BairdMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. City of Owosso v. Union Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Judges of the 74th Judicial District v. Bay CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Van Buren Public School District v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  3. Pontiac Fire Fighters Union Local 376 v. City of PontiacMichigan Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Detroit Board of Education v. Detroit Federation of TeachersMichigan Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Barkau v. RuggirelloMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API