McDaniels v. Doll
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Plaintiff, Thelma McDaniels, filed suit against the defendants herein, Emile B. Doll, a real estate broker, and Mrs. Carmen Rodriguez, the owner of the property in question, for the return of a deposit of 10% or $680, retained by Emile B. Doll, in connection with an agreement to purchase from Mrs. Rodriguez, the property bearing the municipal number 2027-29 N. Rampart Street, in the City of New Orleans, for the price of $6,800.
Defendants filed an "exception" to plaintiff's petition, contending that the said petition embraced two inconsistent causes of action: (a) that the contract was valid…
2Cited by6 opinions
- Casente v. LloydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1953
- Van Horn v. ViningLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Cavalier v. Nola Cabs, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Davis v. Unity Life Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
- O'Rourke v. MooreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.