Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Cooper v. Henslee

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 7, 1975No. 74-102Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partCarleton Harris, Chief Justice

I concur in part and dissent in part to the majority opinion. My concurrence is based on the fact that I agree that the decree must be reversed, but my dissent is premised on the fact that I disagree with the reason for reversal.

I would reverse because I do not feel that the chancery court had jurisdiction. The statues passed upon by the chancellor are a part of the criminal law of our state, listed under the heading, “Treason, Disloyal Conduct, Sabotage.” While I agree with the majority that, under a number of United States Supreme Court decisions, membership alone in a communist…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Noto v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Ferguson v. MartineauSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  4. Gordon v. Smith, ChancellorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API