Legal Opinion

Estate of McMillan v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 30, 1999PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about July 7, 1998, which granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Neither of plaintiffs experts stated that the interlocking safety mechanism, which the 12-year-old decedent deliberately disengaged to gain entry to the elevator shaft for the purpose of engaging in the dangerous activity of “elevator surfing”, was an insufficient safety device. Accordingly, plaintiff failed to raise any triable issue as to whether defendant had neglected to take…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. Armand Erpf EstateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  2. de Peña v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Tillmon v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gaither v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API