Legal Opinion

Broomes v. Brooklyn District

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 17, 2004No. 02-6419, 03-1063PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRORBY, Senior Circuit Judge.

The appellants in this consolidated appeal are lawful permanent residents facing deportation as a result of criminal convictions. They seek habeas corpus relief on grounds they received ineffective assistance of counsel when their respective attorneys failed to adequately advise them of the possible immigration consequences of pleading guilty. We consolidated these cases for procedural purposes, appointed counsel, and granted a certificate of ap-pealability limited to three issues: (1) whether the district court may review an expired state conviction under 28…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Maleng v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Carafas v. LaValleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Errol L. Broomes v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Brooklyn District Attorney Honorable Charles Hynes, Asfaw Mekonnen Abtew v. United States Department of Justice Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API