Legal Opinion
Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Robert J. Hearity
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided February 24, 2012No. 11–1645PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WATERMAN, Justice.
The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board brought a complaint against Robert J. Hearity alleging twelve violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct in his work for five clients. Hearity failed to answer the Board’s complaint or otherwise respond, and as a result, his license has been under temporary suspension since January 11, 2011.. A division of the, Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa determined Hearity engaged in “multiple instances of misconduct” and unanimously recommended a suspension. Upon our de novo review, we find Hearity has…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. TempletonSupreme Court of Iowa · 2010
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. John Edward Netti, Jr.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. CaseySupreme Court of Iowa · 2009
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Eric K. ParrishSupreme Court of Iowa · 2011
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Matthew M. BolesSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Jeffrey K. McGinnessSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Royce D. TurnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. James William McCarthySupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Kenneth F. DolezalSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Mary Ellen KennedySupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.