Legal Opinion
Pharr v. Continental Cas. Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 1, 1983No. 81-984PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment. Billy Joe Pharr (Pharr) filed suit against Russellville Steel Company (Rustco) claiming negligent repair, breach of contract, and breach of warranty. Thereafter, Rustco gave notice of the suit to its insurer, Continental Casualty Company (Continental), requesting it to defend and indemnify Rustco under the terms of the insurance policy. Continental, then in an action separate from the Pharr suit, filed a petition for declaratory judgment to determine its duty to defend and indemnify Rustco. The Circuit Court of Franklin County found that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. BONITZ, ETC.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1982
- Southern Guaranty Insurance Co. v. ThomasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
- Provident Life Accident Ins. Co. v. HeidelbergSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Insurance v. Harbil Restaurant, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959
- Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bob Roberts & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- First Alabama Bank Of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of Connecticut v. Miller, 1100619 (Ala. 12-2-2011)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
- Reeves v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1989
- First Alabama Bank of Montgomery, N.A. v. First State InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. BurgessSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.