Legal Opinion

Flack v. Thaxter

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided February 1, 1892PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from city court, general term. Action by James A. Flack, late sheriff, etc., against Samuel Thaxter and others. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

Bookstaver, J.'

Action on a bond of indemnity. In May, 1889, Stickney, Conyngham & Co. began an action in the city court against Henry Steinbrouek, Sr., to recover $200, wherein a warrant of attachment was issued against the property of Steinbrouck, and directed and delivered to the plaintiff, as sheriff, for execution. By the direction of the attaching creditors two levies were made under the warrant on horses, trucks, harness, shovels, etc. This property was claimed by Steinbrouck, Jr., and one ICemler. Notice of the claim was given to the creditors. They requested the plaintiff, as sheriff,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Conner v. . ReevesNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  2. Clark v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  3. Jenner v. JoliffeNew York Supreme Court · 1810
  4. Moore v. . WesterveltNew York Court of Appeals · 1863
  5. Bowe v. . WilkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Davidson v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Davidson v. McKinleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API