Legal Opinion

Higginbotham v. Bemis Co., Inc.

Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)

Decided December 11, 1986No. 09-86-057 CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BURGESS, Justice.

This is an attempted appeal arising out of a dismissal with prejudice for abuses of the discovery process.

On September 4, 1981, David Higginbotham, D.B. Rodriguez, Marvin Newman, Arthur G. Newman and their respective companies sued Bemis Company, Inc. (Bemis) and Inmont Corporation (In-mont) for alleged violations of the Texas Deceptive Practices Act. On October 17, 1985, the court allowed counsel for all the plaintiffs to withdraw from representing Higginbotham. That same day Bemis filed a motion to compel discovery based upon a request for production filed November…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. North East Independent School District v. AldridgeTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Hinde v. HindeTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Harrigan v. Mason & Winograd, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1979
  4. Fultz v. Cummins Sales & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Walker v. Sharpe, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1991
  2. Shockey v. A.F.P., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Branch v. CulbertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1989
  4. Laura Ichon v. Michael Terry Tatum as President of Chamonix Owners' Association, Inc. Chamonix Owners' Association, Inc. Watson-Beverly, Inc., D/B/A Certified Management of Austin And Resa M. Watson, Individually and as President of Watson-Beverly, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1994
  5. Robert Mihailovich v. John E. Jewell, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API