Roberson v. McCauley
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Hudson, J., special Judge, Anderson, December, 1900. Action for partition by Amanda Roberson against Mary McCauley, William Edwards and John C. Osborne. R. Y. H. Nance, Esq., special referee, filed the following report, omitting formal parts: “IV.
Read the full summary
Before Hudson, J., special Judge, Anderson, December, 1900. Action for partition by Amanda Roberson against Mary McCauley, William Edwards and John C. Osborne. R. Y. H. Nance, Esq., special referee, filed the following report, omitting formal parts: “IV. The plaintiff introduced testimony to show that Abram McCauley, the late husband of Mary McCauley, the defendant herein, had one Mary Yarborough as his wife' during the war and prior to 1865, and that Amanda Roberson was born to them as their child. And that the said Amanda Roberson visited Abram MoCauley at his home in the city of Anderson,…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Chief Justice McIver.
This was an action for partition of a certain lot of land in the city of Anderson, of which one Abram McCauley died seized and possessed, some time in January, 1899. He having died intestate, the only question is as to who is entitled to inherit hi’s estate. The plaintiff, in her complaint, alleges that “the said decedent left surviving him as heirs at law, a daughter, the plaintiff, by a former marriage, and his widow, Mary McCauley, one of the defendants”' — the other two defendants, William Edwards and John C. Osborne, being…
2Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Estate of McDadeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Watson v. EllerbeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907
- Walker v. TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- In re Estate of James, Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco1897
- Mims v. JonesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917