Legal Opinion
Hayden v. Saul
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided February 24, 2020No. 4:19-cv-00187Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MELISHA Y. HAYDEN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Case No. 4:19-CV-187-SPM ) ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, 1 ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an action under
42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c)(3) for judicial review of the final decision of Defendant Andrew M. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) denying the application of Plaintiff Melisha Y. Hayden (“Plaintiff”) for Disability Insurance Benefits (“DIB”) and a Period of Disability under Title II of the Social Security…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Dennis W. Pearsall v. Larry Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Geneva Goff v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
- Gavin Buck v. Nancy BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.