Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Blount

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1877PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error from San Augustine. Tried below before the Hon. George Lane.

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

There is in the transcript of the record that which purports to be a statement of facts, signed by counsel of both parties, though not approved by the presiding judge. There is subscribed to said statement an agreement, as follows:

“It is hereby agreed that this statement of facts in this case may be filed as a part of the record in this case, and may be so treated and considered by the Supreme Court, without the approval of the presiding judge who tried the case. (Signed) Rufus Price, for Pl'ff,

Wm. W. Wallace, for Def't."

Such an agreement cannot supersede the necessity…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Thorington v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1869
  2. Luckett v. TownsendTexas Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Borden v. HoustonTexas Supreme Court · 1847
  4. Frost v. FrostTexas Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Mathews v. RuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1874

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Bell v. BlackwellTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. McManus v. WallisTexas Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Texas & Pacific R'y Co. v. McAllisterTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Amonette v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Stevens & Andrews v. Gainesville National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1884

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API