Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Kansas City Fire & Marine Insurance Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 1962No. 23611PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPERRY, Commissioner.

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, sued defendant insurance company on a “homeowners” insurance policy issued by defendant on the home of plaintiffs. The policy covered loss of personal property on the premises. The case was tried to the court, resulting in a judgment for plaintiffs in the sum of $779.00. Defendant appeals.

It is admitted that the policy, as issued, was in full force at the time the loss occurred, but defendant contends that the loss claimed was not due to a hazard covered by the terms of the policy, but was due to damage by flood waters, a hazard not covered…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Armon v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Pearl Assur. Co. v. Stacey Bros. Gas Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
  3. Sun Underwriters Ins. Co. Of New York v. Loyola University. Loyola University v. Sun Underwriters Ins. Co of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Loyola University v. Sun Underwriters Ins. Co. of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1950

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Russell v. Reliance Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Parmer v. Utah Home Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API