Legal Opinion

Mosely v. Overton

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1934No. 4653PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DREW, Judge.

In the early part of 1931, O. H. Mosely filed suit against E. G. Overton for an account due and' coupled with his suit a writ of attachment under which the following described property was seized:

2 Avery Plows

2 Black Land Plows

1 V-Harrow

1 Moline Cotton Planter

1 .Avery Sweep Stock

1 McCormick Gee Whiz

1 Mare mule, name, Belle

1 Mare mule, name, Mattie

1 Dodge Standard Six Automobile

The lower court" rendered judgment for plaintiff and sustained the writ of attachment. The case was appealed to this court. The suspensive appeal bond was executed by E. G. Overton with F. H. O’Neal and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cooper v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
  2. Ricks v. GanttSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1883
  3. Pickett v. GilmerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  4. Dunbar v. DinkgraveSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1855
  5. McCloskey, Bigley & Co. v. Wingfield & BridgesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Succession of MoodySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API