Legal Opinion

Christiansen v. United States

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided January 8, 1951No. 1415PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

In this action the libellant seeks to recover for injuries sustained through the alleged negligence of the defendant in improperly fastening a sweat board to the wall of a tank aboard the SS Gauntlet. The defendant has impleaded the third party defendants, Edmund D. Burke and William F. Burke, doing business under the name and style of Burke Bros., a co-partnership, which employed the libellant at the time of the injury.

Findings of Fact

On May 27, 1946, the SS Gauntlet was tied up in Boston Harbor. The ship’s owners or agents had contracted with the third party defendant,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. The Queen ElizabethDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1913

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Capadona v. the Lake AtlinDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1951
  2. Christiansen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1951
  3. Peck v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API