Legal Opinion · Dissent

Barrett v. Hal W. Lamb & Associates, Inc.

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 30, 1979No. 34634Published

1DissentUndercofler, Presiding Justice

The Commissioners of Cobb County acted constitutionally in refusing to spot zone the appellees’ property so as to allow commercial development in a totally residential area. I therefore dissent to the majority opinion.

"Spot zoning” has been described as " 'the process of singling out a small parcel of land for a use classification totally different from that of the surrounding area, for the benefit of the owner of such property and to the detriment of other owners.’ ” 2 Rathkopf, The Law of Planning and Zoning § 26.02, p. 26-1, quoting Rodgers v. Village of Tarrytown, 302 N. Y. 115, 123 (96…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Barrett v. HambySupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
  3. Snow v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Cross v. Hall CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
  5. Vulcan Materials Co. v. GriffithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API