Stenger v. Weller
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
1. The exceptions in the first six grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial are without merit. The witness testified fully as to the position in which he found the wrecked cars shortly after the collision, and the physical condition of each car, and the scratches and marks in the road, and then stated his opinion as to which car made the described marks. In the light of the circumstances, the jury may not have been able to see and understand as clearly as the witness the matters sought to be shown, and it was not error, under the ruling and instruction of the court, to allow the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Taylor v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. KeatingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
- Goldberg v. Provident Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Farrer v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
- Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Dual S. Enterprises, Inc. v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Royal Crown Bottling Co. v. StilesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Cobb v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
- Passley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Jefferson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.