Legal Opinion

In Re Appropriation of Easement for Highway Purposes

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 7, 1952No. 766PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSavord, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court.

In order to carry to completion plans for the construction and improvement of U. S. Route No. 25, generally known as the Dixie highway, at a point just south of Bowling Green, Ohio, the Director of Highways, on August 21, 1950, pursuant to statutory provision filed a resolution and finding declaring it necessary to appropriate certain lands belonging to appellants. Within the statutory period, appellants filed their petition in appeal. The cause coming on for trial, judgment was ultimately entered upon the verdict…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sowers v. SchaefferOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Burnquist v. CookSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  3. Cleveland & Pittsburgh Railroad v. BallOhio Supreme Court · 1856
  4. Braslin v. Somerville Horse RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1887
  5. Sherer v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Iowa State Highway Commission v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957
  2. Hendrickson v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. St. Clair County v. BukacekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  4. Anhoco Corporation v. Dade CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1962
  5. Mueller v. NJ Highway AuthorityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API