Legal Opinion

United States v. James Curtis Bernard

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided March 17, 1995No. 92-8676PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury convicted the appellant, James Curtis Bernard, of violating the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, which provides, in relevant part:(a) Whoever in any way or degree obstructs, delays, or affects commerce or the movement of any article or commodity in commerce, by extortion ... shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years....

In order to sustain its burden of proof in a Hobbs Act prosecution, the government must establish an impact on interstate commerce. United States v. Eaves, 877 F.2d 943 (11th Cir.1989).

The issues presented in this case are: (1) whether a prosecutor’s solicitation of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. United States v. Amado Lopez and Thomas LlerenaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. A. Reginald EavesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Jerry v. Mitchell and Roger WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. Jason Luntay TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  3. United States v. GenaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. JacksonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. GenaoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API