Legal Opinion

Monadnock Construction, Inc. v. DiFama Concrete, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 16, 2010PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment, inter alia, declaring that the defendant Hudson Insurance Company is obligated to defend and indemnify the plaintiffs Monadnock Construction, Inc., Hudson Chelsea Associates, LLC, Kimmel Family 23rd Street, LLC, and Mandelbaum 23rd Street, LLC, in an underlying personal injury action entitled Cronin v Hudson Chelsea Assoc., LLC, commenced in the Supreme Court, New York County, under index No, 126112/02, the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brandveen, J.), dated December 5, 2008, as, upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lanza v. WagnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Worth Constr. v. Admiral Ins.New York Court of Appeals · 2008
  3. City of Niagara Falls v. Merchants Insurance GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Borbeck v. Hercules Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. US Bank National Ass'n v. SarmientoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. DellarmoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Allied World Assur. Co. (U.S.) Inc. v. Aspen Specialty Ins. Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  4. Godwin v. Board of Education Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  5. Kelley v. Franklin Cty RehabVermont Superior Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API