Legal Opinion
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 4, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAFFEY, District Judge.
I am now ready to deal with the question as to the admissibility of Exhibit 1132 for Identification, which has been so fully argued by counsel.
The exhibit consists of four papers: a letter purporting to have been written by the Assistant to the Attorney General, without naming any addressee; two memoranda by Special Assistants to the Attorney General; and what has been referred to as the 1926 Benham report, which appears at pages 1 to 85, with numerous exhibits thereto. The whole makes up a document of 368 pages, coupled with the preliminary letter and the memoranda I…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Watkins v. Lessee of HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Chesapeake & Delaware Canal Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Talbot v. SeemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1801
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Williams v. LongDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- California Ass'n of Bioanalysts v. RankDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1983
- Wilson v. Loew's Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Robert Benjamin Pardo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
- Cox v. Wall Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.