Legal Opinion
Schlossman & Gunkelman, Inc. v. Tallman
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 19, 1999No. 980133PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Robert Tallman and Vincent Murphy, individually and doing business as M & T Investment Company, appealed from a judgment awarding Schlossman & Gunkelman, Inc., a $103,432.21 commission, plus interest and costs, under a listing agreement for the Village Square Office and Warehouse in Fargo. We hold the trial court erred in ruling-two letters written by Tallman were not offers of compromise under N.D.R.Evid. 408 and admitting them into evidence in the jury trial. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.
I
[¶ 2] M & T is a partnership which owns commercial…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc., Patricia J. McInnis v. A.M.F., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Ramada Development Company v. Martin W. Rauch, Defendants-Third Party J. Stewart Stein, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Bradbury v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Jean D. Reichenbach, a Single Woman v. David H. Smith, Michael C. Bark and State Farm Fire& Casualty Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Affiliated Manufacturers, Inc. v. Aluminum Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sammons v. Doctors for Emergency Services, P.A.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- McDowell v. McDowellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- City of Bismarck v. Mariner Construction, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Schwab v. ZajacNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Estates of Vizenor and Vizenor v. MeslingNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.