Legal Opinion

Matney v. Adult & Family Services Division

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 6, 1989No. 5-1001-BC4413-3; CA A50406Published

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) that determined that he is employable and terminated his general assistance (GA) grant. We conclude that the order is not supported by substantial evidence and remand for reconsideration.1

Petitioner is in his late twenties and has a high school education. He was severely injured in an accident in 1980. He has since suffered a chronic low back pain syndrome, which also involves pain and twitching in his right calf and pain and numbness in his right foot and buttock. During the first six years after the injury,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Brown v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  3. Hoss v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API