State v. Garza
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The question presented is whether the 1979 amendment to A.R.S. § 8-236 is constitutionally valid insofar as it makes the appeals provisions of the Rules of Procedure for Juvenile Court applicable to appeals from parental termination proceedings 1 or whether it is an unlawful legislative encroachment upon the Arizona Supreme Court's rulemaking authority provided in Ariz.Const. art. VI, § 5, par. 5. 2 The issue was first brought to this court’s attention by appellee’s motion to dismiss appeal. After the parties were given the opportunity to file supplemental memoranda, the issue was…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Arizona Podiatry Ass'n v. Director of InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- New Times, Inc. v. Arizona Board of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. BlazakArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Conway v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1942
- Matter of Appeal in Pima County Etc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- State v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Pompa v. SUPERIOR COURT IN & FOR MARICOPACourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- State v. ForresterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- In Re the Appeal in Pima County, Juvenile Action No. B-9385Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- In re the Appeal in Yavapai County Juvenile Action No. J-9365Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.