Legal Opinion

Application of Fahrni

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 3, 1954No. Patent Appeal 6002PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office in so far as it affirmed the rejection by the Primary Examiner of twelve of the twenty-three claims, which, after numerous amendments during its prosecution in the Patent Office, remained in the application.

Nine claims, numbered 46 to 54 inclusive, were allowed by the Primary Examiner and two, numbered 37 and 40, were allowed by the board. Those involved before us are numbered 25, 27, 30, 35, 36, 39, 42, 45, 55, 56, 57, and 58. All are drawn to the method.

The application, serial…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re LincolnCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1942
  2. In re SwainCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1946
  3. In re ZalkindCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1941
  4. Application of EianeCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  5. In re PottsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Corning Glass Works v. BrennerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Everlube Corp. of America v. Electrofilm, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1957
  3. Rawlings v. National Molasses Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1971
  4. Application of Alexander WeberCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1963
  5. Application of Anthony L. GarneroCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API