Legal Opinion

Burkle v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided August 25, 1986No. Docket Nos. 10774-81, 11637-82, 12271-82, 16953-82Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

ETHEL H. BURKLE, ET AL., 1 Petitioners v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent

Burkle v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 10774-81, 11637-82, 12271-82, 16953-82.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1986-394; 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 212; 52 T.C.M. (CCH) 249; T.C.M. (RIA) 86394;

August 25, 1986.

John E. Drew and John S. Mason, Jr., for the petitioner in docket Nos. 10774-81 and 16953-82.

Judith Burkle Reynolds, pro se in docket No. 11637-82.

David R. Schaefer and Stephen L. Saltzman for the petitioners in docket No. 12271-82.

Robert E. Marum and Powell W. Holly, Jr., for the respondent.

CLAPP

MEMORANDUM…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Beard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981
  2. Harold R. McCombs and Clara F. McCombs v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ruby Mae McCombsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
  3. Baker Et Ux. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  4. Schottenstein v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980
  5. Kent v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1973

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API