People v. Brooks
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that certain comments made by the prosecutor during summation were improper and, thus, deprived him of a fair trial, is unpreserved for appellate review (see CPL 470.05 [2]), because he made only a general objection to one of the comments he now challenges (see People v Tonge, 93 NY2d 838 [1999]; People v Nunez, 82 AD3d 1128, 1129 [2011]), and did not object to the other comments he now challenges (see People v West, 86 AD3d 583, 584 [2011]; People v Bajana, 82 AD3d 1111, 1112 [2011]). In any event, although some of the prosecutor’s comments improperly…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- People v. BleakleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. DanielsonNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- People v. NanandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. FloydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. HokeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. PetersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.