Legal Opinion

Richmond v. Village of Lodi

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1938PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

Sec. 66.06 (10) (a), Stats. 1931, creates the position of manager of a public utility owned by a village, city, or town, and provides without qualification as to time or term that the position be filled by appointment. The operation of a public utility by a village being proprietary, plaintiff suggests the application of a rule to permit the making of a contract of hire by the commission, but the appointment of a manager for the utility is a governmental act. The management, as between itself and the village, sustains a relation described as governmental, even though in the relations of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Springer v. Government of Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  2. Ekern v. McGovernWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Burnap v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  4. State ex rel. Moore v. ArchibaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Wright v. GambleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Adamczyk v. Town of CaledoniaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Richards v. Board of EducationWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State Ex Rel. West v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Schroeder v. City of ClintonvilleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Taplick v. City of Madison Personnel BoardCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API