Legal Opinion
State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. Bottger
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 12, 2011No. 25548PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] While attempting to drive Alisia Ludwig’s car out of a ditch, Andrew Bott-ger pinned Sarah Kosinski under the car. Kosinski sued Bottger for her injuries. Both Ludwig (the owner of the car) and Bottger (the driver of the car) were insured. Ludwig’s car was insured by State Farm Automobile Insurance Company. Bottger was an insured driver on his mother’s insurance policy with AMCO Insurance Company. The State Farm policy provided coverage to “any other person while using such a car if its use is within the scope of consent of you and your spouse[.]” The AMCO policy…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hurst v. Grange Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1996
- Estate of Trobaugh Ex Rel. Trobaugh v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Kathy Marie Cooper v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- State Automobile & Casualty Underwriters v. IshmaelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Northland Insurance Co. v. Zurich American Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Farmers Alliance Mutual Insurance Company v. American Family Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2024