Legal Opinion

People v. Angelis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 10, 2012PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from two sentences of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Mullings, J.), both imposed January 19, 2011, upon his pleas of guilty, on the ground that the sentences were excessive.

Ordered that the sentences are affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Callahan, 80 NY2d 273, 283 [1992]; People v Bradshaw, 76 AD3d 566, 568-569 [2010]), and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claims. However, the sentences imposed were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 *903AD2d 80 [1982]).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. SuitteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  2. People v. CallahanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. QuezadaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. People v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API