Legal Opinion

People v. Menna

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 20, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed and the indictment dismissed.

The Supreme Court of the United States has held that this defendant’s claim of double jeopardy survived his plea of guilty (Menna v State of New York, 423 US 61). On review of such claim on the merits we conclude, with the concurrence of the prosecutor, that the double jeopardy clause precludes the prosecution of defendant on the charge to which he pleaded guilty.

Chief Judge Breitel and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Cooke concur in memorandum.

On reargument: Order reversed,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SammonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1982
  2. People v. GilliamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. Ex Parte BrownCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. State v. WarrenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API