Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Ginther

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1926No. 1271Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING OPINION

Blume, Justice.

The decision of the majority of the court in sustaining the judgment in the court below is partially based on the holding that the designation of the plaintiff as a later beneficiary of the policy sued on is not a ‘ ‘ change of beneficiary” within the meaning of the provisions of the constitution of the brotherhood relating thereto; but that it is an original designation, and that hence the provisions relating to a change need not be complied with. I cannot concur in that opinion.

The benefit certificate provides: “Should the beneficiary named herein die before…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Hellenberg v. District Number One of the Independent Order of BerithNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Fink v. . FinkNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Nally v. NallySupreme Court of Georgia · 1885
  5. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Honor v. NairnMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API