Legal Opinion

Young v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 27, 1895No. 633PublishedCited by 10 opinions

This appeal is from a conviction for theft of a watch over the value of $20, wherein the punishment is assessed at a term of two years’ imprisonment in the penitentiary. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

This appeal is from a conviction for theft of a watch. Appellant was a witness in his own behalf, and testified that Ousley, the owner of the watch, was indebted to him in the sum of $8.50 for labor, and that he would not pay him; that he went to the house of said Ousley; that there was no person at home, except a woman washing in the back yard; that he entered the house, saw the watch, picked it up, and walked out into the yard, held the watch up, and hallooed to the negro woman, and told her that he had Ousley’s watch, and that he had taken it because Ousley would not pay…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. HollywaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
  2. Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Barton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Roberts v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1902
  3. Minica v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Pueblo v. HollidaySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1938
  5. Fogel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API