Legal Opinion

City of Springfield v. West Koke Mill Development Corp.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 14, 2000No. 4 — 99 — 0472PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In August 1997, plaintiff, the City of Springfield (the city), filed a petition to condemn certain property owned by defendant West Koke Mill Development Corporation (Koke Mill) and mortgaged to defendant First of America Bank-Springfield, N.A. (First of America), to make roadway improvements. In April 1999, after a trial, a jury awarded Koke Mill $54,925 as just compensation. Koke Mill and First of America appeal, arguing that (1) the city’s appraisal witness used methods that violated the so-called “unit rule” in evaluating the condemned property, and (2) the city failed to make a bona fide…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Stratton v. Wenona Community Unit District No. 1Illinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Soderlund Bros., Inc. v. Carrier Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  3. City of Chicago v. AnthonyIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. ReddIllinois Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Chicago & Evanston Railroad v. BlakeIllinois Supreme Court · 1886

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Enbridge Energy, LLC v. KuerthAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  2. Department of Transportation Ex Rel. People v. 151 Interstate Road Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  3. Enbridge Pipeline (Illinois), LLC v. HokeAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  4. Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co. v. Pace Suburban Bus ServiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. Enbridge Pipeline (Illinois), LLC v. TempleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API