Hanner and Wife v. Summerhill
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Bowie. Tried below before Hon. John L. Sheppard. For original report of this case, and the briefs of the parties, see Hanner v. Snmmerhill, 6 Texas Civil Appeals Reports, 764. The opinion on the motion for rehearing did not reach the Reporter with the original opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING-.
RAINEY, Associate Justice.
In their motion for rehearing, appellants contend that this court erred in its conclusion of fact in finding that on a former trial appellants “in open court abandoned their claim for the purchase money,” insisting that there is nothing in the record to warrant such a finding.
Appellants begin their brief as follows: “As a clear and succinct statement of the history of this case, we adopt the following extract from the opinion of the Supreme Court of Texas, delivered by Mr. Justice Gaines on a former appeal of this cause (72 Texas, 226, 227).”…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Holliman v. RogersTexas Supreme Court · 1851
- Stachely v. PeirceTexas Supreme Court · 1866
3Cited by21 opinions
- Barmore v. DarraghCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Modern Woodmen of America v. YanowskyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Butman v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
- Cullum v. Lub-Tex Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Barlow v. LinssCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.