Legal Opinion

Whitmer v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 8, 1991No. Record No. 910447PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Whiting

To answer the question, we construe a fire insurance policy provision that fixes the amount of a policyholder’s recovery after destruction of the insured property. We quote from the pertinent facts as set forth in the Fourth Circuit’s order of certification:

Whitmer purchased a homeowners policy from Graphic which included a provision for replacement cost for the real and personal property insured. The premium was computed on the basis of such coverage. On March 21, 1988, Whitmer’s home was totally destroyed by fire. Graphic refused to make any payment under the policy to Whitmer, who had not…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boggs v. DuncanSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SeaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  3. Virginia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. JerrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988
  4. American Home Assurance Company v. HughesSupreme Court of Virginia · 1969
  5. VIRGINIA FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. v. JerrellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1988

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Truesdell v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1997
  2. Rotell v. Erie Insurance Group, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mercer County2001
  3. R. Ray Whitmer v. Graphic Arts Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API